英国无交易Brexit计划的食物欺诈风险

一份新报告称，英国计划在暂停食物规定的情况下暂停食品条例，可以提醒犯罪分子对食物欺诈的机会。

文件says that while suspension of controls could be seen as sensible contingency planning – for example if there are any delays to imports of perishable foods at the UK’s borders - it could signal a “cavalier approach to public health” that in turn could threaten exports from the UK to the EU.

“这个报告称，这不是“收回控制”，题为题目喂养英国：Brexit后的粮食安全并由食品，科学和环境政策专家专家蒂姆·兰松（苏塞克斯大学），托尼刘易斯（特许环境卫生学院）和特里马斯顿教授（卡迪夫大学）教授撰写。

“消费者正确地奇迹暗示谁保证了他们购买的进口食物的安全和质量，”郎说。

A key recommendation in the wide-ranging report – which takes stock of how food, food security and food regulation are being addressed by the UK government in the Brexit discussions – is that a hard ‘food Brexit’ must be avoided at all costs, as under World Trade Organization (WTO) rules the UK would be categorised as a third country.

“这可能有利于一些对冲基金或贸易商，而是为了破坏英国粮食供应的数量和质量的成本，”该报告断言。

它还有问题是迄今为止食品政策是否在Brexit审议中引起了足够的重视，特别是对于农民工对英国食品生产者的重要性，并表示，最新跳棋白皮书与欧盟的建议仅适用于农业和制造，但不是零售或食品服务“在生产和服务部门之间注入英国食品系统中的断层线。”

Lang et al are also deeply concerned that the Food Standards Agency’s decision to press ahead with major reform of UK food safety regulation is “an additional, unnecessary risk… at a time when a stable regulatory regime should be in place as the basis of trade and Brexit negotiations.”

文件notes that the EU is the source of 30 per cent of food for the UK, and says the country must have “a new policy for the UK’s food system, from agriculture to consumption, which is genuinely sustainable, Brexit or no Brexit.”

这不是第一份旨在提出食品安全标准可能面临禁区的风险的报告。今年早些时候，当地政府协会代表英格兰和威尔士的370名理事会，说失去与共享情报资源和可追溯性信息的访问权可以提高事件的风险，例如伴侣丑闻再次发生。

“在没有协议的情况下退出欧盟就此事将在2019年3月留下监管机构，即使根据欧盟 - 英国撤回协议草案的条款，也将从2020年后关闭此类数据库的访问权限，”它建议。